Delhi HC upholds IAF airman's dismissal over viral video

Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of IAF airman Corporal Abhijit Singh for a viral video criticizing service conditions, citing discipline breach.

Delhi HC upholds IAF airman's dismissal over viral video

Image: thehindu.com

The Delhi High Court on May 27, 2026, upheld the dismissal of Indian Air Force (IAF) Corporal Abhijit Singh, who was removed from service in 2023 after posting a viral video on social media criticizing service conditions. The court ruled that the video violated military discipline and conduct rules.

Justice Subramonium Prasad, presiding over the case, stated that the IAF's decision was not disproportionate, as the video undermined the chain of command and discipline essential to the armed forces. The court noted that Singh had not exhausted internal remedies before approaching the High Court.

Singh, who had served for over a decade, argued that his right to freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution was infringed. However, the court held that the right is subject to reasonable restrictions, particularly for members of the armed forces, who must adhere to stricter discipline norms.

The case has drawn attention to the balance between individual rights and military discipline in the digital age. The IAF had initiated court-martial proceedings against Singh after the video went viral, leading to his dismissal in 2023.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Corporal Abhijit Singh dismissed from the IAF?

He was dismissed in 2023 for posting a viral video on social media criticizing service conditions, which the IAF deemed a breach of military discipline and conduct rules.

What did the Delhi High Court rule in this case?

On May 27, 2026, the Delhi High Court upheld his dismissal, stating that the video violated the chain of command and that Singh had not exhausted internal remedies.

Does the freedom of speech apply to armed forces personnel in India?

Yes, but it is subject to reasonable restrictions. The court held that armed forces members must adhere to stricter discipline norms, and the right can be limited in the interest of maintaining order.

πŸ“° Source:
thehindu.com β†’
Share: